Francis Isaac,



Could you explain with details what you understand?

I believe in Benford's Law for picking although we can't verify but not occurring although GillesD has gone through some calculations for our 6/49 validating Benford's Law for the first position.

Francis Issac, a number of years ago, we had a member drop in here and make some claims about some work he and several collegues had done in cracking the lotto - I believe he said he was a scientist at Cambridge. Are you familiar with that work? I'll try to find those posts.

Something's starting to smell .... don't let us down Francis I.

...how many sets were played to get the 5 hitter?...

Indeed - new method - 10 years to develop - on my website

I'll leave this thread alone for now

Francis Isaac

I am happy you came out with a new theory for a 6/49 lottery and I sure hope you will share it with us. But at the same, you can expect quite a few comments on it. And I will be certainly be one of the most critical ones but I have the tendency to base my comments on hard facts, not perceptions, assumptions or similar concepts.

Already, I can make two comments:

A - Number 1 as the most occuring number:

When you say "the most occurring number in the 6/49 lottery is number one", it depends on how you look at numbers and here are a few examples:
- no, number 1 is not the most occuring number in the 49 numbers (taken as a whole), it is simply one out of 49;
- yes and no, number 1 is the most occuring number in all 49 numbers (each digit taken individually) but it shares this distinction with numbers 2, 3, and 4 with 15 occurences while number 0 occurs only 4 times;
- yes, number 1 is the most occuring number if you consider the deltas with 12.24% of all deltas being 1;
- and so on.
So please be specific when making a statement like this.

B - Winnings with your theory:

I am happy you got 5 winning numbers in the UK lottery (with only one number off for the last one). But I sure hope you invested wisely the amount you won, because the draw you mentionned happened on March 7th, 1998. Did you repeat such a good performance lately or has your theory provided you with a steady (and positive) income? Here we have a member that has achieved this quite a few times. (No name please).

WOW, why the suspense? Come on... let's see the hard facts Francis.

We are still waiting............

Hi Grandmaster,

My understanding is that the lottery is absolutely predictable over time and one of the ways of proving this is to collect all the data either Canadian or UK lottery depending on where you reside. You then write a program that will allow you to see how the lottery results and the combinations of 13,983,816 agree with each other. If there is an agreement, then, the lottery cannot be predictable because it is acting in accordance with its theoretical values. The next thing to do is to look at each number in each column and see how that is behaving when compared with the lottery results. There is absolutely no need for complicated mathematical formula because all of this depends on number counting and that depends on a good program. You see, past data has a significant relevance to the future behaviour of this system. Without past data, you cannot predict the future occurrence of the numbers. The system is chaogic and for those who know, every chaos system must have simple pattern in it.

[quote]Originally posted by GillesD
[b]Francis Isaac

Hi GilesD,

I made a comment without specific because I wanted certain discussion about it and I am glad that you have taken that on board. I have had other winnings like five numbers and four numbers but to be honest, I am not here to boast about anything. The only reason that I mentioned that particular one was because it was the closest I have ever got to achieving my objective.

I do not know if what I know is a new theory or not but I hope that it will bring some enlightment to other members in this forum and believe me when I say that I am not here to promote anything either. I just wanted some critizism to my understanding because when people are critical of my understanding, it helps me to check my fact again and again. So, I said that number one is the most occurring number but only in column one or draw 1 because it has the most amount of combination in that column. The combination is 1,712,305.

Hi Lottobug,

it is not possible to just give you a hard fact based on a simple mathematical formula because there simply is not one simple formula to predicting the lottery. What I did was to study the system by challenging certain fundamental facts like:

1. Is the lottery a true representation of a random system?

2. Is it predictable?

3. Can we use past data to predict possible future six number combinations?

4. Does each combination of numbers occur equally?

5. Is the chances of winning the lottery 1 in 13,983,816.

Patience is a virtue and without patience, we cannot learn or understand so, please bear with me as I start to throw hard fact at you and there are so many which will be revealed here free to all members who are interested for the sake of understanding.

Hi Beaker,

There is no need to leave because there is so much to tell and it will all be free. I will reveal as much as I can here in this forum. To be quite honest, I cannot wait but you must realised that if someone has studied a system for 10 years, they must have so much to say that it is just not possible to say it in one go. I will be bringing so much hard fact but I really would like to use the results from the Canadian Lottery so that members can check my fact. The trouble is that I have just downloaded all the results since 1982 and it will take me sometime to put it all in my program but I will try. If you are really interested in the Lottery and you like numbers a lot, then, please wait and give me sometime to start to give you hard facts. This will be like a learning curve.

Hi Beaker,

No I am not familiar with that work. If you can dig out the post, I will be intersted in reading it.

Hi Karnac,

I hope that I will not let you down but you have to make up your own mind as to the way I have studied the lottery and whether it has any practical use for you and the rest of all the members in this forum.