As a Follow Up to GillesD's Table and Statistics, I have Calculated the Total Coverage for the Groups in Regard to ALL 13,983,816 Combinations in a 649 Lotto.


The Following Table ( Horizontal 7 x 7 Matrix ) Lists the 7 Groups of 7 Numbers.

Group 1 Numbers = 01 02 03 04 05 06 07
Group 2 Numbers = 08 09 10 11 12 13 14
Group 3 Numbers = 15 16 17 18 19 20 21
Group 4 Numbers = 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Group 5 Numbers = 29 30 31 32 33 34 35
Group 6 Numbers = 36 37 38 39 40 41 42
Group 7 Numbers = 43 44 45 46 47 48 49

The Following Table Lists ALL the Distributions Available, the Total Combinations Available from ALL 13,983,816 Combinations, the Percentage Available from ALL 13,983,816 Combinations & the Expected Drawn 1 in Every Draws Based on the 13,983,816 Combinations.

1111110 823,543 Combs 5.89% Expected 1 in Every 16.98 Draws
2111100 5,294,205 Combs 37.86% Expected 1 in Every 2.64 Draws
2211000 4,537,890 Combs 32.45% Expected 1 in Every 3.08 Draws
2220000 324,135 Combs 2.32% Expected 1 in Every 43.14 Draws
3111000 1,680,700 Combs 12.02% Expected 1 in Every 8.32 Draws
3210000 1,080,450 Combs 7.73% Expected 1 in Every 12.94 Draws
3300000 25,725 Combs 0.18% Expected 1 in Every 543.59 Draws
4110000 180,075 Combs 1.29% Expected 1 in Every 77.66 Draws
4200000 30,870 Combs 0.22% Expected 1 in Every 452.99 Draws
5100000 6,174 Combs 0.04% Expected 1 in Every 2,264.95 Draws
6000000 49 Combs 0.00% Expected 1 in Every 285,384.00 Draws
Totals > 13,983,816 Combinations 100.00% Percent

The Distribution 2111100 for Example, Means 2 Numbers from ANY One Group and 1 Number from ANY Four Out of the Six Remaining Groups. I have Included the Distributions with Seven Digits to Make it Easier to Understand, BUT the LAST Digit of Each Distribution can be Omitted as the Normal Structure for things Such as Distributions are Normally Only Shown with Six Digits.
No Surprises that the Distribution 2111100 Contains the Most Combinations of 5,294,205.

All the Best.
PAB

I just read through all this thread and was loving the overall feel of it, the assumptions, the arguments, the theories, the stastics, the probabilities, the debunking, it was great!

Plus, because it's been quite a while since Francis Isaac's predictions! (He was a bit gung ho and "I know what I know and you know what you know" lol!) I was wondering if anybody had actually gone back and tested his predictions for validity!

I would but I have no idea how to test them without actually checking through them one by one by visual confirmation, however from what I gather most members here could check them very quickly with there macro's, spreadsheats etc.. Anybody willing to give them a quick once over?

Since the last time I posted on this thread, I felt like giving up my idea because everyone has been so anti. But a win of £6000.00 and another win of £800.00 convinced me that I am right and anyone who does not agree with me, does not understand how the 649 lottery truly works. I am still around and I will now continue to take an active part in this discussion. I am predicting that my next win is either going to be in the region of £140,000 or may be even the Jackpot in the UK lottery. I will let you all know by using the thread with proof of course as soon as I have achieved my prediction.

mremixer,

I am back and we can continue the discussion about the lottery and keep this thread alive.

A good thing you came out of retirement to view today's result for Lotto 6/49: 23 - 40 - 41 - 42 - 44 - 45. Just having 5 numbers in the same group of ten numbers is pretty rare (about 0.3% of the times), but what makes it even more interesting is the bonus number. YES, it is 43, so out of the 7 numbers drawn, 6 of them are consecutive (40 to 45). I know, I know this is not the famous 1-2-3-4-5-6 combination but this confirms that any 6 numbers can and will eventually come, give or take a few centuries, and may be even next saturday.

I agree that I can not prove the combination will come out (or when) but your total reject of this possibility is not based on something. Remember UNLIKELY is not equal to IMPOSSIBLE. And with the amount of snow we got this winter (over 400 cm in Quebec City), I have to say: anything is possible.

Have a look at the PayOff Tables...

This is probably a dumb question, but I am new here and I have looked all over this forum to find the answer with no luck. But, what EXACTLY is the Karnac theory? Where do I find it at? I have saw several posts about how great it is, but no one ever says where they learned it. Can someone help me???

Karnac is a member of the board who has found his own, unique way of using Gail Howard's tools. Search Gail Howard among his posts and you will find it. It can't help me because I don't have Gail's system (it's awfully pricey just to get set up... over $100 Cdn).

Hi Nick,

It`s exciting to talk with you I had seen your work many times which I found very impressive, I`m from Brazil and here we have a lottery with 40 numbers, so I`m trying to wheel it without spend too much, I`ve tried some of the Rade Belic`s system but even that way there is a lot of cards to play so that means high money, so since I saw your comments about the Dragon wheel and 30 wheels, I would like to ask you if there is any wheel which I can use it to better the odds chances!!

Thanks
Jorge Ramos

Hello, Isaac Francis, I agree with much of what he wrote, but I have a question
About columns, and analyzed the results for the order of drawings, by example
Order of draw the number 49 can be the first number of the bet (lotto 49 / 6)
You did a good approach for a pillar in the draws in increasing order, as would
The analysis in the order of the sweepstakes? Everyone knows that lotteries can only predict
Mathematically 100% 3 to 4 numbers of a lottery 49 / 6, then how could you
Help me predict the court by the study of positions since the lottery 46 / 6 has 15 blocks (four numbers) make the analysis of the two columns by drawing lots, by increasing the sweepstakes
The other two numbers will be to complete six eleatorios. Can you help me