Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Karnac
Hello Isla
.......... Take your resulting group of numbers and wheel them. Winners swear by GHs' wheels....and losers swear at them. I find her wheels a bit loose,(ie: not tight enough), but until you use them yourself don't pass judgement....she has had alot of winners using them. Winning is more than selecting numbers. .............Good Luck  |
I also found her wheels loose that came with the original program, so I decided to order some custom abbreivated balanced wheels from her. Best decision I ever made.
I ordered specifically:
2 Power with 34-38 numbers wound for 5 out 6 (5 wheels) and
2 Power with 34-38 numbers wound for 5 out 5(5 wheels).
The later is really tight (but not as tight as a full wheel )and with a little luck you might nail the 6 out 6, but you always get 5 out 6. The secret is selecting the 2 power numbers. I basically chase two sets of LDAs or 1-5s (ie. 2 12 22 32 42 and 3 13 23 33 43) and produce all the subsets of the combos, but with no overlaps (i.e 2,3 2,13,.....42,43 - [basically 25 subsets].
So you have 25 subsets of abbreviated wheels with almost all the remaining integers. You generate just under 50K in combinations. The kicker is you apply two addtional filters, ones you know will pass - preferably with no overlap and you are down to 5k in combinations and then run a skip on the combinations to get it down to a comfortable price for you or your group. With a little luck you nail multiple 3/6 and at least 3-4 4/6 and maybe a 5/6.
The system works well for me because I don't really have to choose/guess which integers I will be using I just chase the two subsets and use the remaining numbers for the wheel and use two filters I know will pass.
Now I know what you are thinking- why not just use the 3 Power abbreviated wheels. You can but it is a lot harder to nail 3 separate integers in 3 subsets with no overlap.
Hope this helps
Linear Mode
